1.4. Lexical Precedence

The precedence and associativity of the operators is hard-wired into the parser. Most operators have the same precedence and are left-associative. This may lead to non-intuitive behavior; for example the Boolean operators "<" and ">" have a different precedence than the Boolean operators "<=" and ">=". Also, you will sometimes need to add parentheses when using combinations of binary and unary operators. For instance

SELECT 5 ! - 6;
will be parsed as
SELECT 5 ! (- 6);
because the parser has no idea -- until it is too late -- that ! is defined as a postfix operator, not an infix one. To get the desired behavior in this case, you must write
SELECT (5 !) - 6;
This is the price one pays for extensibility.

Table 1-1. Operator Precedence (decreasing)

Operator/ElementAssociativityDescription
::leftPostgres-style typecast
[ ]leftarray element selection
.lefttable/column name separator
-rightunary minus
^leftexponentiation
* / %leftmultiplication, division, modulo
+ -leftaddition, subtraction
IS test for TRUE, FALSE, NULL
ISNULL test for NULL
NOTNULL test for NOT NULL
(any other)leftall other native and user-defined operators
IN set membership
BETWEEN containment
OVERLAPS time interval overlap
LIKE ILIKE string pattern matching
< > less than, greater than
=rightequality, assignment
NOTrightlogical negation
ANDleftlogical conjunction
ORleftlogical disjunction

Note that the operator precedence rules also apply to user-defined operators that have the same names as the built-in operators mentioned above. For example, if you define a "+" operator for some custom data type it will have the same precedence as the built-in "+" operator, no matter what yours does.