Many programming languages allow you to give hints to the compiler. In Perl, these hints are conveyed to the compiler with the use declaration. Some pragmas are:
Perl pragmas are all described in Chapter 31, "Pragmatic Modules", but right now we'll just talk specifically about a couple that are most useful with the material covered in this chapter.use warnings; use strict; use integer; use bytes; use constant pi => ( 4 * atan2(1,1) );
Although a few pragmas are global declarations that affect global variables or the current package, most are lexically scoped declarations whose effects are constrained to last only until the end of the enclosing block, file, or eval (whichever comes first). A lexically scoped pragma can be countermanded in an inner scope with a no declaration, which works just like use but in reverse.
To show how this works, we'll manipulate the warnings pragma to tell Perl whether to issue warnings for questionable practices:
Once warnings are enabled, Perl complains about variables used only once, variable declarations that mask other declarations in the same scope, improper conversions of strings into numbers, using undefined values as legitimate strings or numbers, trying to write to files you only opened read-only (or didn't open at all), and many other conditions documented in Chapter 33, "Diagnostic Messages".use warnings; # Enable warnings from here till end of file. ... { no warnings; # Disable warnings through end of block. ... } # Warnings are automatically enabled again here.
The use warnings pragma is the preferred way to control warnings. Old programs could only use the -w command-line switch or modify the global $^W variable:
It's much better to use the use warnings and no warnings pragmas. A pragma is better because it happens at compile time, because it's a lexical declaration and therefore cannot affect code it wasn't intended to affect, and because (although we haven't shown you in these simple examples) it affords fine-grained control over discrete classes of warnings. For more about the warnings pragma, including how to convert merely noisy warnings into fatal errors, and how to override the pragma to turn on warnings globally even if a module says not to, see use warnings in Chapter 31, "Pragmatic Modules".{ local $^W = 0; ... }
Another commonly seen declaration is the use strict pragma, which has several functions, one of which is to control the use of global variables. Normally, Perl lets you create new globals (or all too often, step on old globals) just by mentioning them. No variable declarations are necessary--by default, that is. Because unbridled use of globals can make large programs or modules painful to maintain, you may sometimes wish to discourage their accidental use. As an aid to preventing such accidents, you can say:
This means that any variable mentioned from here to the end of the enclosing scope must refer either to a lexical variable or to an explicitly allowed global. If it's not one of those, a compilation error results. A global is explicitly allowed if one of the following is true:use strict 'vars';
It's one of Perl's program-wide special variables (see Chapter 28, "Special Names").
It's fully qualified with its package name (see Chapter 10, "Packages"),
It's imported into the current package (see Chapter 11, "Modules").
It's masquerading as a lexically scoped variable via an our declaration. (This is the main reason we added our declarations to Perl.)
Of course, there's always the fifth alternative--if the pragma proves burdensome, simply countermand it within an inner block using:
You can also turn on strict checking of symbolic dereferences and accidental use of barewords with this pragma. Normally people just say:no strict 'vars'
to enable all three strictures. See the use strict entry in Chapter 31, "Pragmatic Modules" for more information.use strict;
Copyright © 2001 O'Reilly & Associates. All rights reserved.
HIVE: All information for read only. Please respect copyright! |